U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 2016

United States Sugar Corp. v. Environmental Protection Agency

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided December 23, 2016 · Brown, Griffith, Henderson

671 F. App'x 824

Counsel

Timothy S. Bishop,. Chad Matthew damage, Mayer Brown LLP, Chicago, IL, for Petitioner (Case No. 11-1108)., Norman Louis Rave, Jr., Perry M. Ro-sen, John Charles Cruden, Assistant Attorney General, Sam Hirsch, U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), Environment and Natural Resources Division, Madeline Paradise Fleisher, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Washington, DC, for Respondent (Case No. 11-1108)., David M. Friedland, Beveridge & Diamond, P.C., Claudia M. O’Brien, Stacey Lynn VanBelleghem, Latham & Watkins LLP, William L, Wehrum, Jr., Charles Howland Knauss, Esquire, Lauren Elizabeth Freeman, Makram B. Jaber, Hunton & Williams LLP, Jeffrey A. Knight, Peter H. Wyckoff, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, Harry Moy Ng, John P. Wagner, Senior Attorney, American Petroleum Institute, Lisa Marie Jaeger, Bracewell LLP, James Samuel Pew, Neil Gormley, Attorney, Earthjustice, Quentin Riegel, Deputy General Counsel, National Association of Manufacturers, Washington, DC, William F. Lane, Esquire, Alan Holmes McConnell, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, Raleigh, NC, Allen A. Kacenjar, Jr., Esquire, Douglas A. McWilliams, Esquire, Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP, Cleveland, OH, Shannon S. Broome, Esquire, Attorney, Hunton <& Williams LLP, Hunton & Williams LLP, San Francisco, CA, Ronald A. Shipley Law Office of Ronald A. Shipley, Damascus, MD, Larry Benton Alexander, Esquire, Jones, Foster, Johnston, & Stubbs, P.A., West Plam Beach, FL, Carol F. McCabe, Esquire, Michael Dillon, Attorney, Suzanne llene Schiller, Esquire, Manko, Gold, Katcher & Fox, LLP, Bala Cynwyd, PA, for Interve-nors for Respondent (Case No. 11-1108)., David M. Friedland, Beveridge & Diamond, P.C., Leslie A. Hulse, American Chemistry Council, Washington, DC, for Petitioner (Case No. 11-1141)., Madeline Paradise Fleisher, Hogan Lo-vells US LLP, Norman Louis Rave, Jr., Perry M. Rosen, U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), Environment and Natural Resources Division, Washington, DC, for Respondent (Case No. 11-1141)., William L. Wehrum, Jr., Hunton & Williams LLP, Neil Gormley, Attorney, James Samuel Pew, Earthjustice, Pamela A. Lacey, American Gas Association, William Pedersen, Nidhi J. Thakar, Esquire, Perkins Coie LLP, Jeffrey A. Knight, Peter H. Wyckoff,- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, Harry Moy Ng, John P, Wagner, Senior Attorney, American Petroleum Institute, Robin S. Conrad, Esquire, Partner, Dentons US LLP, Quentin Rie-gel, Deputy General Counsel, National Association of Manufacturers, Lisa Marie Jaeger, Bracewell LLP, James Watson Conrad, Jr., Conrad Law & Policy Counsel, Washington, DC, William F. Lane, Esquire, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, Raleigh, NC, for Intervenors for Respondent, Movant-Intervenor (Case No. 11-1141).

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Standing Rock Sioux Tribe v. United States Army Corps of Engineers (District Court, District of Columbia 2017)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Per Curiam

Upon consideration of the petitions for panel rehearing filed on September 12, 2016 by Louisiana Environmental Action Network, Sierra Club, Clean Air Council, Partnership for Policy Integrity, and Environmental Integrity Project in Nos. 11-1108, et al. and 11-1141, et ah; by American Municipal Power, Inc. in No. 11-1108, et al.; and by EPA in No. 11-1108, et al. as to remedy, and the responses to EPA’s petition, it is

ORDERED that the petition filed by EPA be granted to the extent that the numeric MACT standards set in the Major Boilers Rule for new and existing sources in each of the eighteen subcategories be remanded without vacatur for the agency to conduct further proceedings consistent with the court’s prior opinion, in accordance with the opinion issued herein this date. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the remaining petitions be denied.

The Clerk is directed to enter a new judgment. The Clerk is further directed to issue the mandate'forthwith.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.