U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 2017

Design Technology Group, LLC v. National Labor Relations Board

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided March 15, 2017 · Henderson, Randolph, Tatel

688 F. App'x 3

Counsel

David Richard Koch, Koch & Scow LLC, Henderson, NV, for Petitioners, Ruth E. Burdick, Deputy Assistant General Counsel, Linda Dreeben, Deputy Associate General Counsel, John H. Ferguson, Associate General Counsel, Kellie J. Isbell, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, (NLRB) Appellate and Supreme Court Litigation Branch, Washington, DC, for Respondent, David A. Rosenfeld, Weinberg Roger & Rosenfeld, Alameda, CA, for Intervenor for Respondent, Elizabeth Ann Gaudio, National Federation of Independent Business, Washington, DC, for Amicus Curiae for Petitioner '

Opinion of the Court

JUDGMENT

Per Curiam

These cases were considered on the record from the National Labor Relations Board and the briefs and supplemental briefs of the parties. The court has afforded the issues full consideration and has determined they do not warrant a published opinion. See Fed. R. App. P. 36; D.C. *4Cir. R. 36(d). Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the cases are remanded for reconsideration of the remedy in light of changed circumstances.

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App. P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. R. 41(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.