U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 2018

City of Phoenix, Arizona v. Michael Huerta (ORDER)

City of Phoenix, Arizona v. Michael Huerta (ORDER)
U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided February 7, 2018 · Rogers, Griffith, Sentelle
881 F.3d 932 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Counsel

John E. Putnam, Peter J. Kirsch, Kap-lan Kirsch & Rockwell LLP, Denver, CO, for Petitioner (Case No. 15-1158)., Matthew G. Adams, Esquire, Attorney, Dentons US LLP, San Francisco, CA, Peter Lawrence Gray, Attorney, Dentons US LLP, Washington, DC, for Petitioners (Case No. 15-1247)., Lane N. McFadden, Esquire, Attorney, John Charles Cruden, U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), Environment and Natural Resources Division, Washington, DC, for Respondents.

City of Phoenix, Arizona v. Michael Huerta (ORDER)

Cases that cite this one

9 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

ORDER

Per Curiam

Upon consideration of the joint petition for panel rehearing, it is

ORDERED that the opinion issued August 29, 2017, be amended as follows:

Slip Op., p. 20, Part IV, line 3, insert the word “departure” before the word “routes” and delete the words “and procedures”. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the judgment of the court issued August 29, 2017, be vacated. The Clerk is directed to issue a new judgment. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate until June 15, 2018, unless the parties notify the court prior to that date that the mandate should issue.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.