Daryl Sharp v. Timothy Dolan
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ____________
No. 22-7078 September Term, 2021 1:22-cv-01016-UNA Filed On: August 26, 2022 Daryl Sharp, Ambassador and
Representative of the Living God Jehovah,
Appellant v.
Timothy J. Dolan, Archbishop of New York, et al.,
Appellees
ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
BEFORE: Wilkins and Katsas, Circuit Judges, and Sentelle, Senior Circuit Judge
JUDGMENT
This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). It is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed May 10, 2022, be affirmed. The district court properly dismissed the case as frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989) (“[A] complaint . . . is frivolous where it lacks an arguable basis either in law or in fact.”).
Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App. P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.
Per Curiam
FOR THE COURT: Mark J. Langer, Clerk BY: /s/ Daniel J. Reidy Deputy Clerk
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.