United States v. Nehemias Samayoa
United States v. Nehemias Samayoa
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ____________ No. 22-3050 September Term, 2022 1:16-cr-00115-EGS-1 Filed On: October 31, 2022 United States of America,
Appellee
v.
Nehemias Samayoa, also known as Nehemias Samalloa,
Appellant
ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
BEFORE: Henderson, Wilkins, and Pan, Circuit Judges
JUDGMENT
This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the memoranda of fact and law filed by the parties. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for an opinion. See D.C. Cir. Rule 36. Upon consideration of the foregoing, and the motion to appoint counsel, it is
ORDERED that the motion to appoint counsel be denied. It is
FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s July 15, 2022 order denying appellant’s renewed motion for compassionate release be affirmed. Appellant has not shown that the district court abused its discretion in concluding that he failed to establish extraordinary and compelling reasons warranting a reduction in his sentence. See United States v. Long, 997 F.3d 342, 352 (D.C. Cir. 2021). To the extent that appellant seeks review of the district court’s December 6, 2021 order denying his original motion for compassionate release, that order is not properly before the court. The notice of appeal in this case is not timely as to that order, see Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1)(A), and appellant voluntarily dismissed his prior appeal of that order, United States v. Samayoa, No. 22-3002. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ____________ No. 22-3050 September Term, 2022
Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App. P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.
Per Curiam
FOR THE COURT: Mark J. Langer, Clerk
BY: /s/ Daniel J. Reidy Deputy Clerk
Page 2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished