U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 2024

Dorian Van Horn v. Carlos Del Toro (ORDER)

Dorian Van Horn v. Carlos Del Toro (ORDER)
U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided October 3, 2024
Dorian Van Horn v. Carlos Del Toro (ORDER)

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ____________

No. 23-5169 September Term, 2024 1:18-cv-00038-RBW Filed On: October 3, 2024 Dorian Van Horn,

Appellant v.

Carlos Del Toro, in his official capacity as

Secretary, U.S. Department of the Navy,

Appellee

BEFORE: Srinivasan, Chief Judge; and Wilkins and Walker, Circuit Judges ORDER

Upon consideration of appellee’s motion to amend the unpublished judgment or, in the alternative, petition for panel rehearing, it is

ORDERED that the motion to amend be granted. The judgment filed June 21, 2024, is hereby amended as follows: (1) On page 4, second ¶, delete:

It is of no consequence that Muldrow was a private-sector Title VII case whereas this is a federal-sector ADEA case. We have always interpreted Title VII and the ADEA identically as far as adverse actions go, and we have likewise always treated the private-sector and federalsector provisions of those statutes alike in that respect. See George v. Leavitt, 407 F.3d 405, 410–11 (D.C. Cir. 2005); Baloch v. Kempthorne, 550 F.3d 1191, 1196 (D.C. Cir. 2008); Miller v. Clinton, 687 F.3d 1332, 1336–37 (D.C. Cir. 2012). Understandably, no one asks us to do otherwise here.

The Clerk is directed to issued the amended judgment. The Clerk is further directed to issue the mandate forthwith.

Per Curiam

FOR THE COURT: Mark J. Langer, Clerk BY: /s/ Daniel J. Reidy Deputy Clerk

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.