United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ____________ No. 24-7129 September Term, 2025 1:24-cv-01253-UNA Filed On: October 14, 2025 Rifat Shafique, Appellant v. Equity Residential Real Estate Investment Trust, Appellee ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BEFORE: Millett, Pillard, and Garcia, Circuit Judges JUDGMENT This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). Upon consideration of the foregoing, the motion to supplement the appendix and the lodged supplemental appendix, and the motion for summary reversal, it is ORDERED that the motion to supplement the appendix be granted. It is FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s July 24, 2024 order dismissing the complaint be affirmed and that the motion for summary reversal be denied. Appellant fails to address the district court’s determination that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over her case. Appellant has therefore forfeited any challenge to the dismissal of her case. See United States ex rel. Totten v. Bombardier Corp., 380 F.3d 488, 497 (D.C. Cir. 2004) (“Ordinarily, arguments that parties do not make on appeal are deemed to have been waived.”).

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ____________ No. 24-7129 September Term, 2025 Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App. P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.

Per Curiam

FOR THE COURT: Clifton B. Cislak, Clerk BY: /s/ Daniel J. Reidy Deputy Clerk

Page 2