Antwoyn Spencer v. DOJ

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Antwoyn Spencer v. DOJ

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ____________ No. 25-5086 September Term, 2025 1:24-cv-03641-RDM Filed On: November 6, 2025 Antwoyn Terrell Spencer,

Appellant

v.

United States Department of Justice, et al.,

Appellees

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

BEFORE: Millett, Pillard, and Garcia, Circuit Judges

JUDGMENT

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s January 30, 2025 order dismissing the complaint be affirmed. Appellant has not shown that the district court erred in concluding that his claims are barred by Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994), absent a showing that his convictions have been invalidated.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App. P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.

Per Curiam

FOR THE COURT: Clifton B. Cislak, Clerk

BY: /s/ Daniel J. Reidy Deputy Clerk

Reference

Status
Unpublished