U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 1984

Candace J. Sullivan v. The United States

Candace J. Sullivan v. The United States
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Decided September 6, 1984 · Markey, Rich, Bennett
742 F.2d 628; 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 15180 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Robert A. Reutershan, Washington, D.C., argued for appellant. With him on the brief were Richard K. Willard, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., and David M. Cohen, Washington, D.C., Director., Roxanne Ando, Washington, D.C., of Office of the Gen. Counsel Dept, of Educ., of counsel., John Salter, Washington, D.C., of Office of the Gen. Counsel Office of Personnel Management., Steven M. Schneebaum, Washington, D.C., argued for appellee. With him on the brief was Lisa A. Shapiro, Washington, D.C.

Candace J. Sullivan v. The United States

Cases that cite this one

12 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the United States Claims Court which granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and denied defendant’s motion to dismiss this claim for severance pay. We affirm.

OPINION

The judgment appealed from is affirmed on the basis of the opinion filed by the Claims Court. Sullivan v. United States, 4 Cl.Ct. 70 (1983).

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.