U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 1984

Asea, Inc. v. United States

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Decided November 21, 1984 · Baldwin

748 F.2d 676 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Bernard J. Babb, Freeman, Wasserman & Schneider, New York City, argued for appellant. With him on brief was Philip Yale Simons, New York City, of counsel., Barbara M. Epstein, New York City, argued for appellee. With her on brief were Richard K. Willard, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., David M. Cohen, Director, Washington, D.C., and Joseph I. Liebman, New York City.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Asea, Inc. v. United States (Fed. Cir. 1984)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

BALDWIN, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the United States Court of International Trade (CIT) holding that certain shunt reactors imported from Sweden were properly classified under item 682.60 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States. We affirm.

OPINION

The judgment appealed from is affirmed on the basis of the opinion filed by the CIT. ASEA, Inc. v. United States, 587 F.Supp. 1072 (Ct. Int’l Trade 1984).

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.