U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 1985

Noss Co. v. United States

Noss Co. v. United States
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Decided January 30, 1985 · Baldwin
753 F.2d 1052 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Mark D. Crames, Sandler & Travis, P.C., Miami, Fla., argued for appellant., Kenneth N. Wolf, Dept. of Justice, New York City, argued for appellee. With him on the brief were Richard K. Willard, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., David M. Cohen, Washington, D.C., Director and Joseph I. Liebman, Atty. in Charge Intern. Trade Field Office, New York City.

Noss Co. v. United States

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

BALDWIN, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the United States Court of International Trade holding that certain imported centrifugal cleaning machines called Radiclones were properly classified under item 661.95 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States. We affirm.

OPINION

The judgment appealed from is affirmed on the basis of the opinion filed by the Court of International Trade. Noss Co. v. United States, 588 F.Supp. 1408 (C.I.T. 1984).

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.