U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 1989

Riverside Research Institute v. United States

Riverside Research Institute v. United States
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Decided February 23, 1989 · No. 87-1442 · Archer, Mayer, Michel
877 F.2d 952 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Richard M. Sharfman, of Sharfman, Shanman, Poret & Siviglia, New York City, argued for appellant. With him on the brief was James A. Shanman, of Sharfman, Shanman, Poret & Siviglia, New York City. Of counsel was Raymond S.E. Pushkar, of McKenna, Conner & Cuneo, Washington, D.C., James M. Kinsella, of the Commercial Litigation Branch, Dept, of Justice, Washington, D.C., argued for appellee. With him on the brief were James M. Spears, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., David M. Cohen, Director and Thomas W. Peterson, Asst. Director.

Riverside Research Institute v. United States

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

ARCHER, Circuit Judge.

The Petition for Rehearing is granted.

The judgment is modified to remand the case to the Board to determine the costs incurred and paid by Warwick to construct the leasehold improvements on Riverside’s lease at the Newmark location.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.