Groz v. Fukuhara Indus. & Trading Corp.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit October 25, 1990

Groz v. Fukuhara Indus. & Trading Corp., 918 F.2d 187 (Fed. Cir. 1990)

1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 18829; 1990 WL 163258

Opinion

918 F.2d 187

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
THEODOR GROZ & SOEHNE and Beckert Nadelfabrik,
Commandit-Gesellschaft, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
FUKUHARA INDUSTRIAL & TRADING CORP., Fukuhara Needle Company
Ltd., Precision Fukuhara Works Limited, Monarch Knitting
Machinery Corp., Monarch International Japan, Ltd., and
David Pernick, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 90-1254.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Oct. 25, 1990.

Judgment

PER CURIAM.

(MARKEY, PAULINE NEWMAN and CLEVENGER, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed.Cir.R. 36.

Reference

Full Case Name: Theodor Groz & Soehne and Beckert Nadelfabrik, Commandit-Gesellschaft v. Fukuhara Industrial & Trading Corp., Fukuhara Needle Company Ltd., Precision Fukuhara Works Limited, Monarch Knitting MacHinery Corp., Monarch International Japan, Ltd., and David Pernick
Status: Unpublished