U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 1991

In Re Edward J. Demmel and Hartley Owen

In Re Edward J. Demmel and Hartley Owen
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Decided June 7, 1991
937 F.2d 623; 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 20817; 1991 WL 98957 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

In Re Edward J. Demmel and Hartley Owen

Opinion

937 F.2d 623

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
In re Edward J. DEMMEL and Hartley Owen.

No. 91-1122.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

June 7, 1991.

On Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences, in Case No(s). 88-4031.

PTO

AFFIRMED.

Before NIES, Chief Judge, BENNETT, Senior Circuit Judge, and MAYER, Circuit Judge:

Judgment

PER CURIAM.

1

AFFIRMED. See Fed.Cir.R. 36.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.