Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 1991

Arthur Forman Enterprises, Inc. v. The United States, Arthur Forman Enterprises, Inc. v. The United States, and Affiliated Textile, Inc.

Arthur Forman Enterprises, Inc. v. The United States, Arthur Forman Enterprises, Inc. v. The United States, and Affiliated Textile, Inc.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Decided September 4, 1991
960 F.2d 154; 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 33194 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Arthur Forman Enterprises, Inc. v. The United States, Arthur Forman Enterprises, Inc. v. The United States, and Affiliated Textile, Inc.

Opinion

960 F.2d 154

NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
ARTHUR FORMAN ENTERPRISES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
The UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellant.
ARTHUR FORMAN ENTERPRISES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
The UNITED STATES, Defendant,
and
Affiliated Textile, Inc., Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 91-5109, 91-5117.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Sept. 4, 1991.

22 Cl.Ct. 816.

VACATED AND REMANDED.

ON MOTION

ORDER

1

Upon consideration of the joint motion of the parties to vacate the Claims Court judgment and remand with instructions to dismiss the complaint with prejudice, based on settlement,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

2

(1) The judgment of the Claims Court, Arthur Forman Enterprises, Inc. v. United States, 22 Cl.Ct. 816 (1991) vacated.

3

(2) The case is remanded to the Claims Court with instruct to dismiss the complaint with prejudice.

4

(3) Each party shall bear its own costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑