U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 1991

Pac-Tec, Inc. v. Amerace Corp.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Decided January 14, 1991 · Bennett, Markey, Plager

922 F.2d 1577; 1991 WL 3232 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Owen E. Perry, of Reising, Ethington, Barnard, Perry & Milton, Troy, Mich., argued, for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief, were Jeanne-Marie Buiteweg and Richard W. Hoffmann. Thomas E. Anderson, Gifford, Groh, Sprinkle, Patmore & Anderson, P.C., Birmingham, Mich., for plaintiff-appellant., Ronald A. Sandler, of Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue, Chicago, Ill., argued, for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief, was Sandra B. Weiss. Of counsel were Charles Rutherford, Robert L. Kelly and Dykema Gossett, Detroit, Mich.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Pac-Tec, Inc. v. Amerace Corporation (Fed. Cir. 1991)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MARKEY, Circuit Judge.

Having considered the application of Amerace Corporation (Amerace) for the attorney fees and double costs awarded in the opinion of May 9, 1990, and the oppositions thereto filed by Pac-Tec, Inc. (Pac-Tec) and Owen E. Perry (Perry), IT IS ORDERED that

Amerace is entitled to recover, within 30 days of the date of this ORDER, the sum of $134,000.18 from Pac-Tec and Perry who shall be jointly and severally liable.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.