U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 1991

Pac-Tec, Inc. v. Amerace Corp.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Decided January 14, 1991 · Bennett, Markey, Plager

923 F.2d 173 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Owen E. Perry, of Reising, Ethington, Barnard, Perry & Milton, Troy, Mich., argued, for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief, were Jeanne-Marie Buiteweg and Richard W. Hoffmann.' Thomas E. Anderson, Gifford, Groh, Sprinkle, Patmore & Anderson, P.C., Birmingham, Mich., for plaintiff-appellant., Ronald A. Sandler, of Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue, Chicago, Ill., argued, for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief, was Sandra B. Weiss. Of counsel were Charles Rutherford, Robert L. Kelly and Dykema Gossett, Detroit, Mich.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

In re Pac-Tec, Inc., Pac-Tec, Inc. v. Amerace Corporation (Fed. Cir. 1991)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

*174ORDER

MARKEY, Circuit Judge.

On consideration of Amerace’s application for the attorney fees and costs awarded in this court’s order of October 30, 1989 and the opposition thereto filed by Pac-Tec, the surviving members of the panel in No. 260 having referred the matter to this panel for disposition simultaneously with Ame-race’s application for attorney fees and costs in the appeal,

IT IS ORDERED that Amerace is entitled to recover from Pac-Tec, within 30 days of the date of this ORDER, the sum of $16,600.20 as attorney fees and costs under the order of October 30, 1989.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.