U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 1992

Earl Jason Lariscey v. The United States

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Decided April 30, 1992

962 F.2d 1047; 1992 WL 96180 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

John S. Moot, argued (Buel White and Lewis B. Gardner, on brief), Verner, Liip-fert, Bernhard, McPherson & Hand, Chartered, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff-appellant., Peter Mark Poulos, argued (Stuart M. Gerson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Vito J. DiPietro and Chun-I-Chiang, Attorneys, on brief), Commercial Litigation Branch, Dept, of Justice, Washington, D.C., for defendant-appellee.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Earl Jason Lariscey v. United States (Fed. Cir. 1995)
Earl Jason Lariscey v. The United States (Fed. Cir. 1993)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

*1048 ORDER

A suggestion for rehearing in banc having been filed in this case,

UPON CONSIDERATION THEREOF, it is

ORDERED that the suggestion for rehearing in banc be, and the same hereby is accepted. The judgment entered on November 15, 1991, 949 F.2d 1137, is VACATED, and the accompanying opinion is withdrawn. The mandate issued on January 15, 1992 is RECALLED.

Additional briefing and argument are not indicated at this time.

Note: Pursuant to Fed.Cir.R. 47.8, this order is not citable as precedent. It is a public record.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.