U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 1993

Schaefer Fan Co., Inc., and Ronald E. Schaefer v. Pioneer Systems, Inc., Ronald C. Rutten, James R. Zicarelli, David E. Tess and Delbert Carver

Schaefer Fan Co., Inc., and Ronald E. Schaefer v. Pioneer Systems, Inc., Ronald C. Rutten, James R. Zicarelli, David E. Tess and Delbert Carver
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Decided September 10, 1993
9 F.3d 978; 1993 WL 452251 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Schaefer Fan Co., Inc., and Ronald E. Schaefer v. Pioneer Systems, Inc., Ronald C. Rutten, James R. Zicarelli, David E. Tess and Delbert Carver

Opinion

9 F.3d 978

NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
SCHAEFER FAN CO., INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,
and
Ronald E. Schaefer, Plaintiff,
v.
PIONEER SYSTEMS, INC., Ronald C. Rutten, James R. Zicarelli,
David E. Tess and Delbert Carver, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 93-1506.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Sept. 10, 1993.

DISMISSED.

ON MOTION

ARCHER, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

1

Pioneer Systems, Inc. et al. (PSI) move to dismiss the appeal of Schaefer Fan Co., Inc. and for an award of $500 for attorney fees incurred in connection with the appeal. Schaefer moves to voluntarily dismiss its appeal.

2

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

3

(1) Schaefer's motion to voluntarily dismiss is granted.

4

(2) PSI's motion to dismiss is moot.

5

(3) PSI's motion for sanctions is denied.

6

(4) Each side shall bear its own costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.