U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 1994

Hercules Incorporated v. The United States, Wm. T. Thompson Company v. United States

Hercules Incorporated v. The United States, Wm. T. Thompson Company v. United States
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Decided July 7, 1994 · Plager, Clevenger, Schall
24 F.3d 188 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Counsel

Gregory W. Homer, Atty., Anderson, Kill, Oliek & Oshinsky, Washington, DC, argued, for plaintiff-appellant, Hercules Inc. With him on the brief, were Nancy A. Markowitz and Jerold Oshinsky. Of counsel was Walter S. Rowland, Hercules Inc., of Wilmington, DE., David S. Fishback, Asst. Director, U.S. Dept, of Justice, Washington, DC, argued, for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief, were Stuart M. Gerson, Asst. Atty. Gen., J. Patrick Glynn, Director, Torts Branch, Stephen M. Doyle and Burke M. Wong., Alan Dumoff, Atty., Swankin & Turner, Washington, DC, argued, for plaintiff-appellant, Wm. T. Thompson Co. With him on the brief, was James S. Turner., Stephen M. Doyle, Atty., U.S. Dept, of Justice, Washington, DC, argued, for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief, were Stuart M. Gerson, Asst. Atty. Gen., J. Patrick Glynn, Director, Torts Branch, David S. Fishback, Asst. Director, and Burke M. Wong.

Hercules Incorporated v. The United States, Wm. T. Thompson Company v. United States

Cases that cite this one

94 later published cases cite this decision. The 24 that cite it most often are listed here.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Dissenting Opinion

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.