Eric P. Goldwasser v. Smith Corona Corporation and Smith Corona Acer v. International Business Machines Corporation, Counterclaim
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Fenn v. Yale University (United States District Court for the District of Connecticut 2003)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
26 F.3d 137
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
Eric P. GOLDWASSER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
SMITH CORONA CORPORATION and Smith Corona Acer, Defendants-Appellees.
v.
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION, Counterclaim
Plaintiff-Appellee.
No. 93-1541.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
March 15, 1994.
Before NIES, Chief Judge, NEWMAN and ARCHER, Circuit Judges:
Judgment
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Fed.Cir.R. 36. No sanctions.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.