Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 1994

Simplimatic Engineering Company v. Sentry Equipment Erectors, Inc., and Adam v. Vinoskey

Simplimatic Engineering Company v. Sentry Equipment Erectors, Inc., and Adam v. Vinoskey
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Decided June 9, 1994
29 F.3d 644; 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 14365; 1994 WL 259079 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Simplimatic Engineering Company v. Sentry Equipment Erectors, Inc., and Adam v. Vinoskey

Opinion

29 F.3d 644

NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
SIMPLIMATIC ENGINEERING COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
SENTRY EQUIPMENT ERECTORS, INC., and ADAM V. VINOSKEY,
Defendant-Appellee.

No. 94-1067.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

June 9, 1994.

Before LOURIE, CLEVENGER, and SCHALL, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

1

AFFIRMED. See Fed.Cir.R. 36.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑