Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 1994

Seda International Plastic v. Arpak Plastics, Inc. And American Safety Closure Corp.

Seda International Plastic v. Arpak Plastics, Inc. And American Safety Closure Corp.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Decided June 9, 1994
36 F.3d 1108; 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 14988; 1994 WL 481690 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Seda International Plastic v. Arpak Plastics, Inc. And American Safety Closure Corp.

Opinion

36 F.3d 1108

NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
SEDA INTERNATIONAL PLASTIC, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
ARPAK PLASTICS, INC. and American Safety Closure Corp.,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 94-1291.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

June 9, 1994.

1

DISMISSED.

ORDER

2

The appellant having failed to pay the docketing fee required by Federal Circuit Rule 52(a)(1) within the time permitted by the rules, it is

3

ORDERED that the notice of appeal be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑