Durckheimer v. O'Callaghan

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Durckheimer v. O'Callaghan, 36 F.3d 1111 (Fed. Cir. 1994)
1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 21390; 1994 WL 513258

Durckheimer v. O'Callaghan

Opinion

36 F.3d 1111

NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
Walter DURCKHEIMER, Dieter Bormann, Eberhard Ehlers, Elmar
Schrinner and Rene Heymes, Appellants,
v.
Cynthia H. O'CALLAGHAN, David G.H. Livermore and Christopher
E. Newall, Appellees.

No. 94-1331.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Aug. 2, 1994.

1

DISMISSED.

ORDER

The parties having so agreed, it is

2

ORDERED that the proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed.R.App.P. 42(b).

Reference

Full Case Name
Walter Durckheimer, Dieter Bormann, Eberhard Ehlers, Elmar Schrinner and Rene Heymes v. Cynthia H. O'callaghan, David G.H. Livermore and Christopher E. Newall
Status
Unpublished