U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 1995

Artmatic USA Cosmetics, a Div. of Arthur Matney Co., Inc. v. Pavion Ltd.

Artmatic USA Cosmetics, a Div. of Arthur Matney Co., Inc. v. Pavion Ltd.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Decided July 19, 1995
64 F.3d 673; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 30233; 1995 WL 470705 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Artmatic USA Cosmetics, a Div. of Arthur Matney Co., Inc. v. Pavion Ltd.

Opinion

64 F.3d 673

NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
ARTMATIC USA COSMETICS, a DIVISION OF THE ARTHUR MATNEY CO.,
INC. and Arthur Matney, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
PAVION LTD., Defendant-Appellee,
and
Maybelline Co., Almay Inc., Coty Division of Pfizer Inc.,
Cosmetics & Chemical Manufacturers, Inc., Cosmair, Inc.,
Dell Laboratories Inc., Estee Lauder Inc., Posner Labs, Inc.
and Zalan Products Inc., Defendants.

No. 95-1338.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

July 19, 1995.

DCT

1

DISMISSED.

ORDER

The parties having so agreed, it is

2

ORDERED that the proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed. R. App. P. 42 (b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.