French v. Verderber
French v. Verderber
Opinion
65 F.3d 186
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
Thomas C. FRENCH, Sr. Plaintiff-Counterdefendant/Appellant,
and
Thomas C. French, Jr., Counterdefendant-Appellant,
v.
Joseph VERDERBER and Dale Olmstead d/b/a Dri-Sports Company,
Defendants-Counterclaimants/Appellees.
No. 95-1113.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
July 11, 1995.
DCT
DISMISSED.
ORDER
The appellant having failed to file an appendix required by Federal Circuit Rule 30(a) within the time permitted by the rules, it is
ORDERED that the notice of appeal be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.