Timken Co. v. United States
Timken Co. v. United States
Opinion
82 F.3d 433
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
The TIMKEN COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
The UNITED STATES, Defendant,
and
NTN Bearing Corporation of America, American NTN Bearing
Manufacturing Corporation, and NTN Corporation, Defendants,
and
Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd. and Koyo Corporation of U.S.A.,
Defendants-Appellants,
and
NSK Ltd. and NSK Corporation, Defendants.
No. 95-1305.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
Feb. 29, 1996.
David M. Cohen, Velta A. Melnbrencis, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, Washington, D.C., for The United States.
Terence P. Stewart, James R. Cannon, William A. Fennell, Stewart and Stewart, Washington, D.C., for the Timken Company.
CIT, 69 M.S.P.R. 245.
REMANDED.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the consent motion for remand filed by Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd. and Koyo Corporation of U.S.A. ("Koyo") and the Court's decision in Federal Mogul Corp. v. United States, 63 F.3d 1572 (Fed.Cir. 1995), it is hereby
ORDERED that this appeal is remanded to the Court of International Trade with instructions to remand it to the Department of Commerce for recalculation of the dumping margins for Koyo, using a tax-neutral value-added tax calculation methodology.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.