U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 1996

Litton Systems, Inc. v. Honeywell, Inc./cross-Appellant

Litton Systems, Inc. v. Honeywell, Inc./cross-Appellant
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Decided July 3, 1996 · Newman, Rader, Bryson
87 F.3d 1559; 39 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1321; 96 Daily Journal DAR 9541; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 15958 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Counsel

S. Leslie Misrock, Pennie & Edmonds, New York City, argued, for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were Rory J. Radding, New York City, and Stanton T. Lawrence, III, Washington, D.C. Also on the brief was Frederick A. Lorig, Bright & Lo-rig, Los Angeles, California., Gregory A. Long, Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton, Los Angeles, California, argued, for defendant/cross-appellant. With him on the brief was Kent R. Raygor. Also on the brief were Richard E. Carlton and Joseph E. Neuhaus, Sullivan & Cromwell, New York City, and Laurence H. Pretty, Pretty, Schroeder, Brueggemann & Clark, Los Angeles, California.

Litton Systems, Inc. v. Honeywell, Inc./cross-Appellant

Cases that cite this one

26 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Concurring in Part

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.