U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 1999

Raney v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Decided January 11, 1999

168 F.3d 21; 1999 WL 52382 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Counsel

Mark D. Roth, General Counsel, American Federation of Government Employees, of Washington, DC, for petitioner., Kenneth M. Dintzer, Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. With him on the brief were Frank W. Hunger, Assistant Attorney General, David M. Cohen, Director and Joseph A Kijewski, Assistant Director.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Larry Raney v. Federal Bureau of Prisons (Fed. Cir. 1999)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The appeals, having been heard by a panel of the court and, thereafter, a majority of circuit judges in regular active service having acted sua sponte in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §46(c) and Fed. R.App. P. 35(a),

IT IS ORDERED that the appeal shall be decided in banc.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that new briefs shall be filed. Petitioner’s principal brief is due within 60 days of the date of filing of this order. The dates for filing the remaining briefs shall be in accordance with Fed. Cir. R. 31(a). An original and 30 copies of all briefs shall be filed and two copies shall be served on opposing counsel.

Oral argument will be scheduled in due course.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.