Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 2001

Depalma v. Nike, Inc.

Depalma v. Nike, Inc.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Decided November 30, 2001 · Dyk
25 F. App'x 925

Depalma v. Nike, Inc.

Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION

DYK, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

Nike, Inc., Canstar Sports Group, Inc., Canstar Sports USA, and Sherwood Drolet Corporation (collectively Bauer) move to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. Bernard F. DePalma originally opposed, but has withdrawn his opposition. Bauer replies. DePalma moves to stay proceedings. Bauer requests attorney fees and costs. DePalma opposes.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) Bauer’s motion to dismiss is granted.

(2) DePalma’s motion to stay is moot.

*926(3) Bauer’s request for attorney fees is denied.

(4) Bauer’s request for costs is granted pursuant to Fed. RApp. P. 39(a)(1).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑