U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 2003

International Air Response v. United States

International Air Response v. United States
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Decided April 7, 2003
324 F.3d 1380; 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 6553; 2003 WL 1825824 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Counsel

Lawrence A. Hasten, Lewis and Roca LLP, of Phoenix, AZ, filed a response to the petition for rehearing for plaintiff-appellant., Kenneth S. Kessler, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, filed a combined petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc for defendant-appellee. With him on the petition were Robert D. McCallum, Jr., Assistant Attorney General; David M. Cohen, Director; and Donald Khmer, Assistant Director.

International Air Response v. United States

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

ORDER

A combined petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc having been filed by the Appellee, and a response thereto having been invited by the court and filed by the Appellant, and the petition for panel rehearing having been referred to the panel that heard the appeal, and thereafter the petition for rehearing en banc and response having been referred to the circuit judges who are in regular active service,

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The petition for panel rehearing is denied. 1

*1381 (2) The petition for rehearing en banc is denied.

(3) The mandate of the court will issue on April 14, 2003.

1

. The merits panel issues an order simultaneously with this order.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.