Bowers v. Baystate Technologies, Inc.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Bowers v. Baystate Technologies, Inc., 320 F.3d 1316 (Fed. Cir. 2003)

Bowers v. Baystate Technologies, Inc.

Opinion of the Court

ON COMBINED PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC

ORDER

A combined petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc having been filed by the Appellant1, a response thereto having been invited by the court and filed by the Cross-Appellant, and the petition for panel rehearing having been referred to the panel that heard the appeal, and thereafter the petition for rehearing en banc, response and amici curiae brief having been referred to the circuit judges who are in regular active service,

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The petition for panel rehearing is granted.

(2) The petition for rehearing en banc is denied.

(3) In view of the panel’s revised opinion, the court vacates the panel’s judgment and original opinion entered August 20, 2002, Harold L. Bowers v. Baystate Technologies, Inc., 302 F.3d 1334 (Fed.Cir. 2002).

. Professor Mark A. Lemley filed an amici curiae brief in support of the petition.

Reference

Full Case Name
Harold L. BOWERS (doing business as HLB Technology), Plaintiff-Cross v. BAYSTATE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published