Fields v. Nicholson
Opinion of the Court
ON MOTION
ORDER
The parties move without opposition to vacate the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims’ decisions in Fields v. Nicholson, 03-1809, 20 Vet.App. 144 (2005), Biby v. Nicholson, 03-2123, 2005 WL 2669731 (2005), Walton v. Nicholson, 04-168, 2005 WL 2670373 (2005), Satterfield v. Nicholson, 04-444, 2005 WL 3059393 (2005), and Nichols v. Nicholson, 03-790, 2005 WL 3682934 (2005) and remand for further proceedings consistent with this court’s decision in Mayfield v. Nicholson, 444 F.3d 1328 (Fed.Cir. 2006).
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
(1) The motions are granted.
(2) All sides shall bear there own costs.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Robert FIELDS, Claimant-Appellant v. R. James NICHOLSON, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee Kenneth J. Biby, Claimant-Appellant v. R. James Nicholson, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee Ralph E. Walton, Claimant-Appellant v. R. James Nicholson, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee Betty J. Satterfield, Claimant-Appellant v. R. James Nicholson, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, RespondentAppellee Robert V. Nichols, Claimant-Appellant v. R. James Nicholson, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
- Status
- Published