Manning v. United States
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Manning v. United States, 212 F. App'x 967 (Fed. Cir. 2006)
Manning v. United States
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Richard Thomas Manning submits correspondence that we treat as a motion for reconsideration of the court’s October 4, 2006 order dismissing Manning’s appeal for failure to pay the filing fee.
Manning has now paid the filing fee.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
(1) The comet’s October 4, 2006 dismissal order is vacated, the mandate is recalled, and the appeal is reinstated.
(2) The Appellees should calculate the due date for their briefs from the date of filing of this order.
Counsel for parties who intend to participate in this appeal should promptly enter an appearance if they have not already done so.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Richard Thomas MANNING v. UNITED STATES, and State of Massachusetts, City of Brookline, Suffolk County, Walt Disney Company, Bournewood, Eascare, LLC, Westwood Pembroke Health Care, Arnold Communications, Inc., and City of Boston, and City of Pittsfield, and Town of Westwood, and Norfolk County, and AT & T Broadband and Comcast, and General Electric and UNUM Life Insurance Co. of America, and Viacom, Inc., and Blue Cross Blue Shield of Mass., and Faulkner Hospital, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, and Dana Farber Cancer Institute, and Fallon Ambulance Service, and AMR of Massachusetts, Inc.
- Status
- Published