Wavestream v. Cap Wireless
Wavestream v. Cap Wireless
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
2007-1264
WAVESTREAM CORPORATION,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CAP WIRELESS, INC.,
Defendant-Appellee.
Charles S. Barquist, Morrison & Foerster LLP, of Los Angeles, California, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were Anthony L. Press, and Brian F. McMahon.
Robert E. Camors, Jr., Thelen Reid Brown Raysman & Steiner, LLP, of San Jose, California, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were David B. Ritchie, and Richard S. Swope. Of counsel was Nguyen Huu Nguyen. Appealed from: United States District Court for the Central District of California Judge S. James Otero
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
2007-1264
WAVESTREAM CORPORATION,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CAP WIRELESS, INC.,
Defendant-Appellee.
Judgment ON APPEAL from the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA In CASE NO(S). 05-CV-4254. This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam: (MAYER, Circuit Judge, PLAGER, Senior Circuit Judge and LOURIE, Circuit Judge):
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT DATED: December 7, 2007 /s/ Jan Horbaly
Jan Horbaly, Clerk
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished