U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 2007

Wavestream v. Cap Wireless

Wavestream v. Cap Wireless
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Decided December 7, 2007

Wavestream v. Cap Wireless

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2007-1264

WAVESTREAM CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v.

CAP WIRELESS, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

Charles S. Barquist, Morrison & Foerster LLP, of Los Angeles, California, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were Anthony L. Press, and Brian F.

McMahon.

Robert E. Camors, Jr., Thelen Reid Brown Raysman & Steiner, LLP, of San Jose, California, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were David B.

Ritchie, and Richard S. Swope. Of counsel was Nguyen Huu Nguyen.

Appealed from: United States District Court for the Central District of California Judge S. James Otero NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2007-1264

WAVESTREAM CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CAP WIRELESS, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

Judgment ON APPEAL from the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA In CASE NO(S). 05-CV-4254.

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam: (MAYER, Circuit Judge, PLAGER, Senior Circuit Judge and LOURIE, Circuit Judge):

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED: December 7, 2007 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.