Amini Innovation Corporation v. Anthony California, Inc.
Amini Innovation Corporation v. Anthony California, Inc.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
2007-1182
AMINI INNOVATION CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v.
ANTHONY CALIFORNIA, INC. and JAMES CHANG, Defendants-Appellees.
Mark D. Nielsen, Cislo & Thomas LLP, of Santa Monica, California, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were Daniel M. Cislo and Kelly W.
Cunningham.
Edward F. O’Connor, O’Connor Christensen & McLaughlin, Trial Division of The Eclipse Group LLP, of Irvine, California, argued for defendants-appellees. On the brief were Thomas T. Chan, Ronald M. St. Marie, and Lisa A. Karczewski, Chan Law Group LLP, of Los Angeles, California.
Appealed from: United States District Court for the Central District of California Judge S. James Otero NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2007-1182 AMINI INNOVATION CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ANTHONY CALIFORNIA, INC. and JAMES CHANG, Defendants-Appellees.
Judgment ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the Central District of California In CASE NO(S). 03-CV-8749.
This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam (RADER, Circuit Judge, PLAGER, Senior Circuit Judge and MOORE, Circuit Judge).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT DATED: November 13, 2007 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.