In Re Michael L. Beigel
In Re Michael L. Beigel
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2007-1146 (Serial No. 10/064,380)
IN RE MICHAEL L. BEIGEL, NATHANIEL POLISH, STEVEN R. FRANK, and ROBERT E. MALM
Robert E. Malm, Robert E. Malm Law Offices, of Pacific Palisades, California, for appellant.
Nathan K. Kelley, Associate Solicitor, Solicitor’s Office, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Arlington, Virginia, for appellee. With him on the briefs were Stephen Walsh, Acting Solicitor, and Thomas W. Krause, Associate Solicitor.
Appealed from: United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2007-1146 (Serial No. 10/064,380)
IN RE MICHAEL L. BEIGEL, NATHANIEL POLISH, STEVEN R. FRANK, and ROBERT E. MALM
JUDGMENT ON APPEAL from the United States Patent and Trademark Office Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences In CASE NO(S). Serial No. 10/064,380 This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36
Per Curiam (NEWMAN, RADER, and DYK, Circuit Judges).
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
DATED: October 18, 2007 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.