U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 2007

Honeywell Intern. v. Universal Avionics Systems

Honeywell Intern. v. Universal Avionics Systems
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Decided August 10, 2007
493 F.3d 1358 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Honeywell Intern. v. Universal Avionics Systems

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ERRATA

August 10, 2007

Appeal Nos. 2006-1406,-1435 Honeywell International, Inc. v. Universal Avionics Systems Corp. Decided: July 3, 2007 Precedential Opinion Change the opinion as follows: • Replace “the angular direction of an object” on page 8, line 15, with “direction.” • Omit “angular” on page 8, line 16. • Replace “angular direction of the runway line from a point on that runway” on page 8, lines 17–18, with “direction of the runway itself.”

With these changes, the two affected sentences should read as follows: The specification and prosecution history both make clear that the patentees used the term “heading” to refer to direction from a point on a runway. Thus, the “heading of the aircraft” is the direction of the aircraft from a point on a runway, and the “heading of the runway” is the direction of the runway itself.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.