Honeywell Intern. v. Universal Avionics Systems
Honeywell Intern. v. Universal Avionics Systems
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ERRATA
August 10, 2007
Appeal Nos. 2006-1406,-1435 Honeywell International, Inc. v. Universal Avionics Systems Corp. Decided: July 3, 2007 Precedential Opinion Change the opinion as follows: • Replace “the angular direction of an object” on page 8, line 15, with “direction.” • Omit “angular” on page 8, line 16. • Replace “angular direction of the runway line from a point on that runway” on page 8, lines 17–18, with “direction of the runway itself.”
With these changes, the two affected sentences should read as follows: The specification and prosecution history both make clear that the patentees used the term “heading” to refer to direction from a point on a runway. Thus, the “heading of the aircraft” is the direction of the aircraft from a point on a runway, and the “heading of the runway” is the direction of the runway itself.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.