Capital Bridge v. Ivl Technologies

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Capital Bridge v. Ivl Technologies

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2006-1637

CAPITAL BRIDGE CO., LTD.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

IVL TECHNOLOGIES, LTD.,

Defendant-Appellee,

and

MEMCORP, INC. and CRAIG ELECTRONICS, INC.,

Defendants.

Brian L. Wamsley, Goodwin Procter LLP, of New York, New York, argued for plaintiff-appellant. On the brief was Anthony H. Handal, Brown Rudnick Berlack Israels, LLP, of New York, New York.

Daniel P. Burke, Daniel P. Burke & Associates, PLLC, of Hauppauge, New York, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief was Georgia Damoulakis. Appealed from: United States District Court for the Southern District of New York Judge Kenneth M. Karas

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2006-1637

CAPITAL BRIDGE CO., LTD.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

IVL TECHNOLOGIES, LTD.,

Defendant-Appellee,

and

MEMCORP, INC. And CRAIG ELECTRONICS, INC.,

Defendants.

Judgment ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the Southern District of

New York in CASE NO(S). 04-CV-4002 This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Per Curiam (MICHEL, Chief Judge, SCHALL, Circuit Judge, and BUCKLO i ,

District Judge).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT DATED: August 10, 2007 /s/ Jan Horbaly

Jan Horbaly, Clerk i Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo, District Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, sitting by designation.

Reference

Status
Unpublished