Capital Bridge v. Ivl Technologies
Capital Bridge v. Ivl Technologies
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2006-1637
CAPITAL BRIDGE CO., LTD., Plaintiff-Appellant, v.
IVL TECHNOLOGIES, LTD., Defendant-Appellee, and MEMCORP, INC. and CRAIG ELECTRONICS, INC., Defendants.
Brian L. Wamsley, Goodwin Procter LLP, of New York, New York, argued for plaintiff-appellant. On the brief was Anthony H. Handal, Brown Rudnick Berlack Israels, LLP, of New York, New York.
Daniel P. Burke, Daniel P. Burke & Associates, PLLC, of Hauppauge, New York, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief was Georgia Damoulakis.
Appealed from: United States District Court for the Southern District of New York Judge Kenneth M. Karas NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2006-1637 CAPITAL BRIDGE CO., LTD., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. IVL TECHNOLOGIES, LTD., Defendant-Appellee, and MEMCORP, INC. And CRAIG ELECTRONICS, INC., Defendants.
Judgment ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in CASE NO(S). 04-CV-4002 This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam (MICHEL, Chief Judge, SCHALL, Circuit Judge, and BUCKLO i , District Judge).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
DATED: August 10, 2007 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk
i Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo, District Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, sitting by designation.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.