In Re Rodger Burrows
In Re Rodger Burrows
Opinion
Corrected: August 9, 2007
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
2007-1091 (Serial No. 09/910,654)
IN RE RODGER BURROWS
Richard M. Saccocio, Richard M. Saccocio, P.A., of Plantation, Florida, argued for appellant.
Nathan K. Kelley, Associate Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Arlington, Virginia, argued for the Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office. With him on the brief was William LaMarca, Associate Solicitor. Of counsel was Stephen Walsh, Acting Solicitor.
Appealed from: United States Patent and Trademark Office Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
2007-1091 (Serial No. 09/910,654)
IN RE RODGER BURROWS
Judgment ON APPEAL from the UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES
This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
Per Curiam (RADER, SCHALL, Circuit Judges, FARNAN, JR., District Judge 1 ).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
DATED: August 9, 2007 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk
1 Honorable Joseph J. Farnan, Jr., District Judge, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, sitting by designation.
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished