Dolby Laboratories v. Lucent Technologies

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Dolby Laboratories v. Lucent Technologies

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2006-1583, -1595

DOLBY LABORATORIES, INC. and DOLBY LABORATORIES LICENSING CORPORATION,

Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants-Cross Appellants,

v.

LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

Defendant/Counterclaimant- Appellant,

and

LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES GUARDIAN I LLC,

Counterclaimant-Appellant.

Jeffrey M. Fisher, Farella Braun & Martel LLP, of San Francisco, California, argued for plaintiffs/counterclaim defendants-cross appellants. With him on the brief were John L. Cooper, Andrew Leibnitz, and Nan E. Joesten.

John M. Desmarais, Kirkland & Ellis, LLP, of New York, New York, argued for defendant/counterclaimant-appellant and counterclaimant defendant-appellant. With him on brief were Robert A. Appleby, Alan S. Kellman, Anne S. Toker, and Jason S. Grauch. Of counsel was Edward C. Donovan, of Washington, DC.

Appealed from: United States District Court for the Northern District of California

Judge Jeremy Fogel NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2006-1583, 1595 DOLBY LABORATORIES, INC. and DOLBY LABORATORIES LICENSING CORPORATION,

Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants-Cross Appellants, v. LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

Defendant/Counterclaimant- Appellant, and

LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES GUARDIAN I LLC,

Counterclaimant-Appellant.

Judgment ON APPEAL from the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA In CASE NO(S). 01-CV-20709.

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Per Curiam (RADER, SCHALL and LINN, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED: August 8, 2007 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Reference

Status
Unpublished