Dolby Laboratories v. Lucent Technologies
Dolby Laboratories v. Lucent Technologies
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2006-1583, -1595
DOLBY LABORATORIES, INC. and DOLBY LABORATORIES LICENSING CORPORATION, Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants-Cross Appellants, v.
LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendant/Counterclaimant- Appellant, and LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES GUARDIAN I LLC, Counterclaimant-Appellant.
Jeffrey M. Fisher, Farella Braun & Martel LLP, of San Francisco, California, argued for plaintiffs/counterclaim defendants-cross appellants. With him on the brief were John L. Cooper, Andrew Leibnitz, and Nan E. Joesten.
John M. Desmarais, Kirkland & Ellis, LLP, of New York, New York, argued for defendant/counterclaimant-appellant and counterclaimant defendant-appellant. With him on brief were Robert A. Appleby, Alan S. Kellman, Anne S. Toker, and Jason S. Grauch.
Of counsel was Edward C. Donovan, of Washington, DC.
Appealed from: United States District Court for the Northern District of California Judge Jeremy Fogel NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2006-1583, 1595 DOLBY LABORATORIES, INC. and DOLBY LABORATORIES LICENSING CORPORATION, Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants-Cross Appellants, v. LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendant/Counterclaimant- Appellant, and LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES GUARDIAN I LLC, Counterclaimant-Appellant.
Judgment ON APPEAL from the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA In CASE NO(S). 01-CV-20709.
This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam (RADER, SCHALL and LINN, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
DATED: August 8, 2007 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.