Carlson v. Merit Systems Protection Board
Carlson v. Merit Systems Protection Board
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 07-3071
RICHARD H. CARLSON, Petitioner,
v.
MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent.
Peter B. Broida, of Arlington, Virginia, argued for petitioner.
Joyce G. Friedman, Attorney, Office of the General Counsel, United States Merit Systems Protection Board, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent. With her on the brief were B. Chad Bungard, General Counsel, Rosa M. Koppel, Deputy General Counsel, and Sara B. Rearden, Acting Associate General Counsel.
Appealed from: United States Merit Systems Protection Board NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 07-3071
RICHARD H. CARLSON, Petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent.
Judgment
ON APPEAL from the MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD in CASE NO(S). CH0752040095-C-2 This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam (LOURIE, LINN, and MOORE, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
DATED July 17, 2007 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.