Interspiro v. United States
Interspiro v. United States
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
2007-5019
INTERSPIRO, INC.,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
and
SCOTT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., d/b/a
SCOTT HEALTH & SAFETY,
Plaintiff,
v.
UNITED STATES,
Defendant-Appellee,
and
MINE SAFETY APPLIANCES CO.,
Defendant-Appellee.
David R. Hazelton, Lathan & Watkins LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was Joshua K. Chandler.
Timothy P. McIlmail, Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant- appellee, United States. On the brief were Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Jeanne E. Davidson, Director, Brian M. Simkin, Assistant Director, and Leslie Cayer Ohta, Attorney. Of counsel was John G. Terra, Attorney, Air Force Legal Services Agency, United States Air Force, of Arlington, Virginia.
Thomas P. Humphrey, Crowell & Moring, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee, Mine Safety Appliances Co. With him on the brief were Elizabeth W. Newsom, Amy Laderberg O’Sullivan, and Rebecca K. Lee. Appealed from: United States Court of Federal Claims Judge Nancy B. Firestone
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. CORRECTED United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
2007-5019
INTERSPIRO, INC.,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
and
SCOTT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., d/b/a
SCOTT HEALTH & SAFETY
Plaintiff,
v.
UNITED STATES,
Defendant-Appellee,
and
MINE SAFETY APPLIANCES CO.,
Defendant-Appellee.
Judgment ON APPEAL from the UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS In CASE NO(S). 06-CV-425. This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
Per Curiam (RADER, BRYSON and MOORE, Circuit Judges).
Affirmed. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT DATED: July 11, 2007 /s/ Jan Horbaly
Jan Horbaly, Clerk
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished