Tehrani v. Polar Electro

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Tehrani v. Polar Electro

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2008-1135

FLEUR T. TEHRANI, PH.D.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

POLAR ELECTRO and POLAR ELECTRO OY,

Defendants-Appellees,

and

PHYSI-CAL ENTERPRISES,

Defendant,

and

CAT EYE CO., LTD.,

Defendant-Appellee.

William C. Rooklidge, Howrey LLP, of Irvine, California, argued for plaintiff- appellant. With him on the brief was Henry A. Petri, Jr., of Houston, Texas.

John P. Moran, Holland & Knight LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees Polar Electro, et al. With him on the brief was Tamara F. Carmichael, of New York, New York.

Joseph M. Kuo, Olson & Cepuritis, Ltd., of Chicago, Illinois, argued for defendant-appellee Cat Eye Co., Ltd. With him on the brief were Seymour Rothstein and Matthew D. Kellam. Appealed from: United States District Court for the Central District of California Judge David O. Carter

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2008-1135

FLEUR T. TEHRANI, PH.D.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

POLAR ELECTRO and POLAR ELECTRO OY,

Defendants-Appellees,

and

PHYSI-CAL ENTERPRISES,

Defendant,

and

CAT EYE CO., LTD.,

Defendant-Appellee.

Judgment ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the Central District of

California in CASE NO(S). 05-CV-1113 and 06-CV-20 This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Per Curiam (NEWMAN, RADER and PROST, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT DATED December 5, 2008 /s/ Jan Horbaly

Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Reference

Status
Unpublished