U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 2008

Procell v. Peake

Procell v. Peake
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Decided October 10, 2008

Procell v. Peake

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2008-7039 NIKOLAS PROCELL, Claimant-Appellant, v. JAMES B. PEAKE, M.D., Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee.

Micah S. Myers, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for claimant-appellant. Mark R. Lippman, The Veterans Law Group, of La Jolla, California, for claimant-appellant.

Martin F. Hockey, Jr., Assistant Director, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent-appellee. With him on the brief were Gregory G. Katsas, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Jeanne E. Davidson, Director. Of counsel on the brief were Ethan G.

Kalett, Supervisory Attorney, and Tracey P. Warren, Attorney, Office of the General Counsel, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, of Washington, DC.

Appealed from: United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims Judge William A. Moorman NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2008-7039 NIKOLAS PROCELL, Claimant-Appellant, v. JAMES B. PEAKE, M.D., Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee.

Judgment ON APPEAL from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims In CASE NO(S). 05-2510.

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam (RADER, PLAGER, and GAJARSA, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED: _October 10, 2008__ / s / Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.