Solomon v. Office of Compliance
Solomon v. Office of Compliance
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
2007-6002, -6003
ROBERT SOLOMON,
Petitioner,
v.
OFFICE OF COMPLIANCE,
Respondent,
and
OFFICE OF THE ARCHITECT OF THE CAPITOL,
Respondent.
Jeffrey H. Leib, of Washington, DC, argued for petitioner.
William Wachter, Attorney, Office of the General Counsel, Office of Compliance, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent Office of Compliance. With him on the brief was Peter A. Eveleth, General Counsel.
Kelsi Brown Corkran, Attorney, Appellate Staff, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent Office of the Architect of the Capitol. With her on the brief were Jeffrey S. Bucholtz, Acting Assistant Attorney General, and Marleigh D. Dover, Attorney. Appealed from: Office of Compliance
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
2007-6002, -6003
ROBERT SOLOMON,
Petitioner,
v.
OFFICE OF COMPLIANCE,
Respondent,
and
OFFICE OF THE ARCHITECT OF THE CAPITOL,
Respondent.
Judgment ON APPEAL from the Board of Directors of the Office of Compliance In CASE NO(S). 02-AC-62 (RP) and 04-AC-13 (RP). This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam (RADER, Circuit Judge, CLEVENGER, Senior Circuit Judge, and DYK, Circuit Judge.
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT DATED: _September 9, 2008____ / s / Jan Horbaly
Jan Horbaly, Clerk
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished