Spiroflow Systems v. Flexicon Corp.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Spiroflow Systems v. Flexicon Corp.

Opinion

CORRECTED

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2008-1034

SPIROFLOW SYSTEMS, INC.

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

FLEXICON CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellee.

W. Thad Adams, III, Adams Intellectual Property Law, P.A., of Charlotte, North Carolina, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was Stephen S. Ashley, Jr.

Randolph J. Huis, Volpe and Koenig, P.C., of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were Stephen B. Schott. Of counsel on the brief were Michael S. Connor, Lance A. Lawson, and Brian F. McMahon, Alston & Bird, LLP, of Charlotte, North Carolina. Of counsel was John J. O’Malley, Volpe and Koenig, P.C., of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Appealed from: United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina Magistrate David Keesler

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2008-1034

SPIROFLOW SYSTEMS, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

FLEXICON CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellee.

Judgment ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the Western District of North

Carolina In CASE NO(S). 3:02-CV-70. This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam (RADER, Circuit Judge, ARCHER, Senior Circuit Judge, and DYK, Circuit Judge).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT DATED: June 10, 2008 /s/ Jan Horbaly

Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Reference

Status
Unpublished